From Classical to Epistemic Game Theory

نویسنده

  • Andrés Perea
چکیده

In this paper we give a historical overview of the transition from classical game theory to epistemic game theory. To that purpose we will discuss how important notions such as reasoning about the opponents, belief hierarchies, common belief, and the concept of common belief in rationality arose, and gradually entered the game theoretic picture, thereby giving birth to the field of epistemic game theory. We will also address the question why it took game theory so long before it finally incorporated the natural aspect of “reasoning” into its analysis. To answer the latter question we will have a close look at the earliest results in game theory, and see how they shaped our approach to game theory for many years to come.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Non-Classical Approaches to the Brandenburger-Keisler Paradox

In this paper, we consider a well-known epistemic game theoretical paradox, called the Brandenburger-Keisler Paradox, and provide various alternative models in which the paradoxical statement becomes satisfiable. For this task, first, we resort to various non-classical logical frameworks, and reformulate the paradoxical statement in them. We discuss the paradox in non-well-founded set theory an...

متن کامل

Epistemic logics and their game theoretic applications: Introduction

This paper is written as an introduction to epistemic logics and their game theoretic applications. It starts with both semantics and syntax of classical logic, and goes to the Hilbert-style proof-theory and Kripke-style model theory of epistemic logics. In these theories, we discuss individual decision making in some simple game examples. In particular, we will discuss the distinction between ...

متن کامل

Communication strategies in games

We formulate a formal framework in which we combine the theory of dynamic epistemic logic and the theory of games. In particular, we show how we can use tools of dynamic epistemic logic to reason about information change – and in particular, the effect of communication acts – in such a game of imperfect information. We show how this framework allows for the formulation of specific assumptions i...

متن کامل

A Note on Bayesian Games

This paper tackles some conceptual problems in the epistemic foundations of classical game theory. Focus is placed on the discussions of the asymmetry of different epistemic standpoints in modeling a game and the thesis of no subjective probability for self-action in games.

متن کامل

The epistemic logic of IF games

We analyze IF/hyper-classical games by bringing together two viewpoints from Jaakko Hintikka’s work: game semantics, and epistemic logic. In the process, we link up between logic and game theory. 1 Logic meets games Game theory and logic met in the 1950s — and Jaakko Hintikka has been a pioneer ever since in introducing game-theoretic viewpoints into logic, from his early basic evaluation games...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • IGTR

دوره 16  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2014